200 billion is a lot, but something in the ballpark of just 7%. [1] I agree, it’s hard to measure, but do you think those estimates are more than 3% off? Best

200 billion is a lot, but something in the ballpark of just 7%. [1] I agree, it’s hard to measure, but do you think those estimates are more than 3% off? Best case, eliminating all drug research saves you 10%. Although if costs in other areas are bloated, that is a scarier number. [1] https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nationalhealthaccountshistorical.html https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/sta...