3 ms·
> selectively releasing true facts that support your agenda or actively harm your opponent, at very specific times when its most advantageous for you to do it
by throwaway6356 8y ago
> selectively releasing true facts that support your agenda or actively harm your opponent, at very specific times when its most advantageous for you to do it
anyone can claim this about any media report that is negative to them. bottom line is: don't do dirt if you don't want it brought to the light.
> actively working with Russian Intelligence to destabilize western civilization
if there was any actual evidence of this I am sure we would have seen it by now.
> If Wikileaks had their way I don't think you'd like the NWO that Putin and China would build for us
this is nothing but evidence free conspiracy theorizing.
- phaus 8y agoThe conspiracy theorizing consists entirely of you reading into what I said and turning it into an argument that it wasn't, but that you feel would be easy to dismiss.