3 ms·

"It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have not published critical information on Russia, Syria or Donald Trump [in fact, Wiki

by Varcht 8y ago

"It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have not published critical information on Russia, Syria or Donald Trump [in fact, WikiLeaks has published hundreds of thousands of documents on Russia, millions on Syria, and thousands on Donald Trump, see https://wikileaks.org/spyfiles/russia/ https://wikileaks.org/spyfiles/russia/, https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=russia%7Cputin%7Cmoscow#results https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=russia%7Cputin%7Cmoscow#..., https://wikileaks.org/syria-files/ https://wikileaks.org/syria-files/ & https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=trump#results https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=trump#results]."

jeremy7600 8y ago
Not one trump release since he announced his candidacy. Hmmm.
hannasanarion 8y ago
ooooOOOOOOooooOOOO is Julian going to sue me for defamation now? Allow me to amend: Wikileaks now publishes Russia and putin related material long after they aquire them and only after they are called out on it. They sat on the "spy files" for a full year, and only published them after their source went around telling other publications about them. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-l...
- elif 8y ago
  No... but your argument was defamed of its basis.
- taylodl 8y ago
  Are you suggesting Wikileaks may have had a hidden agenda? Say it ain't so! </sarcasm>
- davvolun 8y ago
  I did not interpret the parent comment to be arguing against you, rather, I thought it was supporting your case -- Wikileaks is fully aware of their hypocrisy and is trying to stifle internal (and external) discussion about it.
8note 8y ago
isn't that a different statement? releasing some doesn't mean he released everything, or stuff Russia wasn't okay with him releasing.

by Varcht 8y ago

jeremy7600 8y ago

Not one trump release since he announced his candidacy. Hmmm.

hannasanarion 8y ago

ooooOOOOOOooooOOOO is Julian going to sue me for defamation now? Allow me to amend: Wikileaks now publishes Russia and putin related material long after they aquire them and only after they are called out on it. They sat on the "spy files" for a full year, and only published them after their source went around telling other publications about them. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-l...

elif 8y ago
No... but your argument was defamed of its basis.
taylodl 8y ago
Are you suggesting Wikileaks may have had a hidden agenda? Say it ain't so! </sarcasm>
davvolun 8y ago
I did not interpret the parent comment to be arguing against you, rather, I thought it was supporting your case -- Wikileaks is fully aware of their hypocrisy and is trying to stifle internal (and external) discussion about it.

8note 8y ago

isn't that a different statement? releasing some doesn't mean he released everything, or stuff Russia wasn't okay with him releasing.