3 ms·

I'd have to disagree with the transitions from C++ to python or java and bash. The complication is C++ specific and moving to java, bash or python is simply re

I'd have to disagree with the transitions from C++ to python or java and bash. The complication is C++ specific and moving to java, bash or python is simply removing that complexity. Hence moving to C++ is easier then moving from python or another similar language because in most cases you would be adding complexity. OCaml and Erlang are too different for me to comment about a transition in the functional direction.

nickik 8y ago
But then the whole argument falls appart. Sure if you learn standard boring OOP in C++ then you can apply it. Thats what Java was designed for. Hoever to even get there you first need to learn incredibly complex nonsense and waste massive amounts of time for knowlage that is virtually useless. Then you might as well pick up Java, the most popular OOP language and learn it there.