3 ms·
I'd buy them, but it would have to be a set for £25, and on sale during one of the 100 sales they have each year. Side Note: I don't know why they haven't made
by jermaustin1 8y ago
I'd buy them, but it would have to be a set for £25, and on sale during one of the 100 sales they have each year.
Side Note: I don't know why they haven't made their way stateside, they are one of my favorite department stores. Always clean, friendly staff, toilets are impeccable (though that might just be a British thing).
- user5994461 8y agoJohn Lewis? It's insanely expensive and the variety of products is risible. I remember looking at the pans and the fans this summer. There were more options above £100 than below. There was hardly anything basic and certainly not at a basic price. When my vacuum cleaner died last year, I went to look for another one and they didn't have any except Dyson and its luxury competitors.
- OJFord 8y agoIt's often cheaper than Amazon for the market segment it serves. I don't think 'JL has more pans above £100 than below' is any more valid a complaint than 'Target has more pans below $100 than above'. (I've been to a Target once, sorry if that's not accurate, but I'm sure you see what I mean and can substitute something that is!)
- user5994461 8y agoI don't know about the luxury market segment, didn't try to compare there. I'm trying to illustrate that they are not competing on the low to medium range. Going there a few times only to find nothing and have to buy on Amazon. Ain't going again. IMO they're ignoring a big market segment and they are missing out on customers. Maybe it works out in the city and canary wharf but I doubt it would fare well in the less affluent countryside.