3 ms·
The situation seems to be similar for Mac: https://twitter.com/bgolus/status/1080327518983315457 https://twitter.com/bgolus/status/1080327518983315457 > Yeah,
by tpush 8y ago
The situation seems to be similar for Mac: https://twitter.com/bgolus/status/1080327518983315457 https://twitter.com/bgolus/status/1080327518983315457
> Yeah, I didn't want to touch on Mac support in the original post, but Mac support also cost way more than it made in sales.
- andai 8y agoInnumerate person here, does that mean that supporting Mac is a net loss for a business?
- backpropaganda 8y agoFor this particular business. I don't think he's representative. Using tools like Unity makes it much easier to deploy on Mac and Linux.
- ken 8y agoIt's impossible to say for sure, without knowing people's behavior and motivations. In the past, I've certainly been more likely to buy software if I see it's cross-platform, even if I know I'll never use it on those other platforms. Or it might be a corporate requirement. There are many possible reasons. For example, if a restaurant serves only steak, is it a net loss for them to put a pasta option on the menu, if they know they'll never sell enough to make up the cost of ingredients and preparation? Maybe not -- it could mean a party of 10 (with 1 vegetarian) is willing to eat there, when they otherwise wouldn't have been.
- jenscow 8y agoA "loss leader"