3 ms·
It's a good start but since it's meant to compare your own note taking app to others it's indeed a bit biased. Maybe make it easier for others to contribute to
by laurent123456 8y ago
It's a good start but since it's meant to compare your own note taking app to others it's indeed a bit biased. Maybe make it easier for others to contribute to the table, and add a few missing features (for instance web clipper is not in the list). Also the negative categories like "no bloat", "no wysiwyg" being marked a positive for your app is a bit weird. Many users will not see a web clipper or wysiwyg as bloat.
- fabiospampinato 8y agoYou raised some good points. Some things are kind of biased by definition, as I also mention in a paragraph below the table what I consider bloat can be considered as useful features by somebody else, and the UI part is somewhat subjective as well. I think contributing to it should be easy enough, one just has to edit this [1] HTML file. It was a plain Markdown/ASCII table earlier, but since it's quite wide it wasn't looking too good. [1] https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable/blob/master/resources/comparison/table.html https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable/blob/master/resou...