I’ve always thought the best argument against nuclear is a political one. It takes a well-coordinated state to maintain and regulate nuclear power. You need reg

I’ve always thought the best argument against nuclear is a political one. It takes a well-coordinated state to maintain and regulate nuclear power. You need regulators completely divorced from the profit side. I mean, we assume that we’ll be stable in 40 years time, but will we be? I don’t know too much about this particular aspect, but I imagine that even the risk management part of paying for insurance gets tricky once you’re projecting out 10+ years. All this being said, it’s the best argument in my view, but still not prohibitive. I still find myself believing in nuclear power, especially more research into advanced tech.