4 ms·
I have made something like that [1] for my note-taking app. It doesn't currently include Trillium though, and it may be skewed towards the features I'm personal
by fabiospampinato 8y ago
I have made something like that [1] for my note-taking app. It doesn't currently include Trillium though, and it may be skewed towards the features I'm personally interested in, but if somebody would like to help make it better I'm all ears.
[1] https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable#comparison https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable#comparison
- I_am_tiberius 8y agoTurtl is missing.
- ymgch 8y agoGood!
- NetOpWibby 8y agoI currently use Bear but your app looks really nice!
- laurent123456 8y agoIt's a good start but since it's meant to compare your own note taking app to others it's indeed a bit biased. Maybe make it easier for others to contribute to the table, and add a few missing features (for instance web clipper is not in the list). Also the negative categories like "no bloat", "no wysiwyg" being marked a positive for your app is a bit weird. Many users will not see a web clipper or wysiwyg as bloat.
- fabiospampinato 8y agoYou raised some good points. Some things are kind of biased by definition, as I also mention in a paragraph below the table what I consider bloat can be considered as useful features by somebody else, and the UI part is somewhat subjective as well. I think contributing to it should be easy enough, one just has to edit this [1] HTML file. It was a plain Markdown/ASCII table earlier, but since it's quite wide it wasn't looking too good. [1] https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable/blob/master/resources/comparison/table.html https://github.com/fabiospampinato/notable/blob/master/resou...