How do you define "throughly" anyway? Just like a comment in the original post, >>But anything less than 100% coverage guarantees that some part of the code i

How do you define "throughly" anyway? Just like a comment in the original post, >>But anything less than 100% coverage guarantees that some part of the code is not tested... > And anything less than 100% race coverage similarly guarantees a hole in your testing. As does anything less than 100% configuration-combination coverage. As does anything less than 100% input coverage. As does anything less than 100% hardware-configuration testing. As does ...