You're spot on that it would be almost impossible to approach an already entrenched mgmt system with this unproven model. It's also true that there's an overhe

You're spot on that it would be almost impossible to approach an already entrenched mgmt system with this unproven model. It's also true that there's an overhead with using the system, but that's the end of our agreement. Because folks only vote on what they're interested in, the system works very fluidly. No work is held up waiting for someone, and you don't have to wade through votes that you don't care about. We use our system, and use the contribution rating to pay ourselves, and distribute equity. And it's working very smoothly. I spend about 20-30 minutes a week 'rating'. And the rest of the voting happens seamlessly (much like voting on HN) It's very, very difficult to game the system b/c everything is so transparant. It would look ridiculous.