5 ms·
Is that not talking about general A.I. tho? And sure, many people argue that might never happen ... But we already have many specific A.I.s, and those specific
by jarofgreen 8y ago
Is that not talking about general A.I. tho? And sure, many people argue that might never happen ... But we already have many specific A.I.s, and those specific A.I.s are already making lots of big decisions that affect people's lifes. Sounds like some safety policy there could be worth thinking about.
- cs02rm0 8y agoYes. But then specific AI safety is an even smaller problem.
- jarofgreen 8y agoDisagree. It's a different problem, not necessarily smaller. It's clearly not yet a solved problem, and as some of the issues interact with many other social issues there are no easy answers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_Math_Destruction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapons_of_Math_Destruction is the usual starting point referenced here.
- ndnxhs 8y agoIts not particularly interesting though. A calculator is a kind of specilized AI that can do maths massively faster than a human can.
- jarofgreen 8y agoWell, it's not going to be interesting to everyone. But there are many people who are interested in it; Cathy O'Neil wrote a whole book about it. The main point is I'd argue that it's a big problem that needs people to look at it. (80,000 hours website was actually talking about general AI - https://80000hours.org/career-guide/world-problems/ https://80000hours.org/career-guide/world-problems/ - but I'd still argue specific A.I.s need attention too)