4 ms·
That's a great piece of animation. I don't know if the content-less opening and ending are there to be true to an original film reel or something along those li
by porphyrogene 8y ago
That's a great piece of animation. I don't know if the content-less opening and ending are there to be true to an original film reel or something along those lines, but for those who haven't visited the link it's about seven minutes of animation.
- p1mrx 8y agoSet the playback speed to 2X, and it's only 3.5 minutes. Viewers must've been more patient in the 1960s.
- porphyrogene 8y agoThat would ruin the timing and deprive the viewer of the subtlety in the animation. The single-frame transformations into animals and the connecting frames while the camera's perspective pans would be almost impossible to distinguish. This is art, not a lecture. Digesting the series of events in the most efficient way possible is not the point. No one cares how the story ends, it's nice but trivial compared to the animation itself.