No it doesn't. It says the sound was crickets. There were symptoms, and there was a sound. It was assumed that post hoc ergo propter hoc - the sound was the ca

No it doesn't. It says the sound was crickets. There were symptoms, and there was a sound. It was assumed that post hoc ergo propter hoc - the sound was the cause of the symptoms. This was always a strong hypothesis without real evidence to back it up.