5 ms·
> We have 3 kids and we were looking for 4 bedrooms My family was short on bedrooms growing up, so we doubled up. Nothing wrong with that.
by skookumchuck 8y ago
> We have 3 kids and we were looking for 4 bedrooms
My family was short on bedrooms growing up, so we doubled up. Nothing wrong with that.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- matthewmacleod 8y agoMe too, but it’s definitely a compromise, especially as the kids get older. I’d rather have a slightly lower-quality property than shared bedrooms unless the situation makes that infeasible.
- cheald 8y agoIt's certainly preferable to not have to double up bedrooms, but we have to remember that our parents did it just fine. I grew up in a family of 6 in a 1600 sq ft house. It worked just fine, but we'd look at that today and consider it unacceptably cramped. Demand for space per occupant has risen. It doesn't make sense to expect our parents' price tags when we're demanding larger properties.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- skookumchuck 8y agoThere's some evidence that kids who share bedrooms have better social skills. Historically, the concept of separate bedrooms is very, very recent. The expected size of bedrooms has also risen dramatically in the last few years. Some are even bigger than the living rooms of houses built in the 1970s.
- EADGBE 8y agoIt's a slippery slope; always needing to be more successful than our previous generations (At a younger age to boot!).