>I am also going to explore the titular subject of this article, “Do blind technology consumers get what we pay for?” This just seems like such an obvious ‘no’

>I am also going to explore the titular subject of this article, “Do blind technology consumers get what we pay for?” This just seems like such an obvious ‘no’ to me, that I lost interest in reading the article at that point. Blind users obviously pay for a huge amount of features they can’t use, that were made for non-blind people, and have a disproportionately small amount of features tailored for their use. Unless the blind consumer market becomes bigger than the non-blind market, I’d expect this to always be the case.