> they are in roles where more time put in equals more work done This is partially true if: 1) you only hire young folks 2) you don't care about long term he

> they are in roles where more time put in equals more work done This is partially true if: 1) you only hire young folks 2) you don't care about long term health of your team Based on this philosophy I could work 90h/week and get even more done i.e. there is always work to be done but IMHO this way of working is unhealthy and not sustainable. Personally for me it takes more time than the average to recharge so having a shorter working week helps with recharging and do well next week and be productive. And by that I mean being equally productive to a "full time". > if you aren't paying 100% attention, that doesn't cost money I'd argue it can cost you money, in different ways.