4 ms·
Interesting. And makes me wonder what else we are missing and misunderstanding, as we waste so much time trying to express the complexity of the world in spoken
by k9s9 8y ago
Interesting. And makes me wonder what else we are missing and misunderstanding, as we waste so much time trying to express the complexity of the world in spoken language rather than math. Not just physics but in sociology, psychology, economics etc.
Faraday purely from experiments 30-40 years before Maxwell, intuitively understood electromagnetism. Nobody serious believed it because he didn't have the training to express it mathematically. Dyson is saying it took Physicists another 20-30 years post Maxwell to get it. So basically ~70 years wasted.
- naringas 8y ago> So basically ~70 years wasted. to call those years wasted implies that we shouldn't have had to wait for them. it suggests that we should look for a way to bypass them.
- madengr 8y agoMaxwell unified electromagnetism into a propagating wave. That was the big leap. Before that, things were disparate. Hertz proved it experimentally, and Heaviside turned it into an engineering discipline.
- tntn 8y agoThis is true of the mathematics, but it's worth noting that Faraday had already proposed EM waves ~30 years earlier based on his intuitive understanding.
- jbay808 8y agoAnd had rejected the aether, on the basis that it was unimaginable that any medium could propagate transverse waves in all directions but not allow longitudinal waves.
- Retric 8y agoWasted implies the solution is somehow obvious but that’s hindsite bias. Looking at lotto winners it feels easy. But, the reality is a lot of effort went to things both promising and wacky to get those steps forward. And other less major progress is being glossed over.
- tim333 8y agoSpoken language has a lot going for it. I note the featured article and it's discussion are all words not maths. By the way looking at Maxwell's paper it seems awful complicated https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstl.1865.0008 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstl.1865... compared to the modern form of the equations https://ethw.org/w/images/d/d6/Maxwell_image_02.jpg https://ethw.org/w/images/d/d6/Maxwell_image_02.jpg
- ncmncm 8y agoThe modern form of the equations was worked out by commoners, so had to be filtered through the work of others before it could be taught.
- scabarott 8y agoYou're really caught up on this commoner/non-commoner dynamic (from your other comments). Was it really that important? - many of the well known scientists of that time were 'commoners'.
- ncmncm 8y agoI'm not, but they were. But it was not discussed openly in print at the time, and so must be inferred.
- tim333 8y agoI just read his Wikipedia and he was sponsored by his uncle Sir Charles Wheatstone of Wheatstone bridge fame and ended up a Fellow of the Royal Society so was not so badly situated.
- Gibbon1 8y agoHeaviside thought that too which is why he invented the modern form. Not that he just used a different set of math to describe the problem, he invented the math too.
- 8y ago
- ncmncm 8y ago[retracted]
- tntn 8y agoLord? Faraday was no lord. He was also dead by the time Maxwell gave this presentation.
- grigjd3 8y agoIn truth, it generally takes significant time to arrive at fundamental theories. Most people don't realize this because in a physics class, at best, you might get taught when so-and-so published an equation.
- pm90 8y ago> Pupin went first to Cambridge and enrolled as a student, hoping to learn the theory from Maxwell himself. He did not know that Maxwe ll had died four years earlier. After learning that Maxwell was dead, he stayed on in Cambridge and was assigned to a college tutor. It wasn't that people spend all those years actually working on this problem. There wasn't an internet nor modern travel to share/disseminate/argue about these ideas.