My point is this statement right here: >Technology is just applied and abstracted physics. Like thats it. Technology is so simple. It's just physics. I'm argu

My point is this statement right here: >Technology is just applied and abstracted physics. Like thats it. Technology is so simple. It's just physics. I'm arguing with your attitude and your technology worship. AS if nanotechnology is right around the corner and will cure cancer 100%. Cancer is not a trivial problem and likely a problem that will not be solved within our lifetimes. All the article is saying is that data science, machine learning and all these buzz words popping out of silicon valley aren't the answer to cancer. But we have people like you heralding machine learning and nano-machines as the answer to problems such as world peace. Open your eyes.