39 ms·
wouldnt a system that is "blind" in the sense that it has no prejudice be free to use those (anything) as features? isnt the whole point of the NN to get loans
by anewguy9000 8y ago
wouldnt a system that is "blind" in the sense that it has no prejudice be free to use those (anything) as features? isnt the whole point of the NN to get loans repaid?
- m0zg 8y agoYes, but then you end up in a morally fraught territory where someone can claim that you ended up rejecting the loan because someone is a woman or gay or whatever. If those factors _directly_ aren't a consideration, your position is a lot more defensible. Story time: Google ad serving system used to think (and probably still does) that if someone is interested in engineering topics per their browsing patterns, they're a male, much to the consternation of female Google engineers. If gender wasn't a feature in the system at all (an unrealistic proposition in an ad targeting system), this problem would not arise as there would be no way for a system to determine if someone is male or female due to the absence of the corresponding feature, and therefore descriptive vocabulary. More defensible, at least, if not "fair".