3 ms·
Blind interviews do not help like you think [1] and overall the fact of the matter is that it's just not proven to work yet. It sounds like you're making up a
by fzeroracer 8y ago
Blind interviews do not help like you think [1] and overall the fact of the matter is that it's just not proven to work yet.
It sounds like you're making up a lot of hysteria for absolutely nothing, considering I have rarely seen any D&I efforts that would negatively impact me as a white man. Ultimately if you want to argue about D&I efforts being ineffectual you need to be less sensationalist and more grounded in facts.
[1] http://behaviouraleconomics.pmc.gov.au/projects/going-blind-see-more-clearly-unconscious-bias-australian-public-service-aps-shortlisting http://behaviouraleconomics.pmc.gov.au/projects/going-blind-...
- toomuchtodo 8y agoI don’t think I’m being sensationalist, generating hysteria, nor am I asking to discuss this with you. I made my comments primarily so that those with grievances about D&I activities in their orgs that don’t adhere to labor law have an idea how to seek redress. No more, no less. Edit: continuing to argue here is simply going to pollute the thread and risks a mod detachment. My email is in my profile if you want to continue the discussion.
- fzeroracer 8y agoAnd if you're not willing to argue or discuss your point, then you're admitting you're just here to spit out politics rather than discuss them or the topic in any meaningful manner. D&I activities are worthy of critique and discussion because there is a lot that can be improved, but putting your foot down and acting like all D&I efforts are racist, sexist or should involve talking to a lawyer is absolutely sensationalist and generating hysteria.