3 ms·
No, the author makes baseless claims about the future of technology under the guise of "being reasonable". Technology is just applied and abstracted physics, so
by TaupeRanger 8y ago
No, the author makes baseless claims about the future of technology under the guise of "being reasonable". Technology is just applied and abstracted physics, so I'm not sure what your point is there. No one said anything about data science...this seems a little ranty TBH. You aren't arguing against anyone in this thread.
- crimsonalucard 8y agoMy point is this statement right here: >Technology is just applied and abstracted physics. Like thats it. Technology is so simple. It's just physics. I'm arguing with your attitude and your technology worship. AS if nanotechnology is right around the corner and will cure cancer 100%. Cancer is not a trivial problem and likely a problem that will not be solved within our lifetimes. All the article is saying is that data science, machine learning and all these buzz words popping out of silicon valley aren't the answer to cancer. But we have people like you heralding machine learning and nano-machines as the answer to problems such as world peace. Open your eyes.