> I'd argue that comments like these are fluff. It depends on who you're trying to reach. Since the GP wants his open-source commits to be "learning opportunit

> I'd argue that comments like these are fluff. It depends on who you're trying to reach. Since the GP wants his open-source commits to be "learning opportunities for others," it might make sense to comment in that level of detail. That particular comment does contain semantic information which is not expressed in the code: that the thread is being prioritized for rendering purposes. It's possible you could communicate that through variable names, though.