4 ms·
iota is silly because it's non-descriptive even though there are so much more descriptive alternatives, such as simply naming it range. To me, iota falls under
by mschuetz 8y ago
iota is silly because it's non-descriptive even though there are so much more descriptive alternatives, such as simply naming it range. To me, iota falls under the same category as naming variables acig, gfeq, fqcl, aiwn, or any other permutation of of 4 letters that have nothing to do with what it does.
- meheleventyone 8y agoI also keep reading it as i-to-a which shows my own bias but doesn’t help it being immediately understood.
- garmaine 8y agoAlso, maybe shows your dyslexia.