3 ms·
> We need to get rid of that rule now that the justification for it no longer exists What changed that I was unaware of? As far as I know, it still makes traff
by war1025 8y ago
> We need to get rid of that rule now that the justification for it no longer exists
What changed that I was unaware of? As far as I know, it still makes traffic flow much more efficient in most situations.
Also, at least where I live, the walk light wouldn't be on at the same time as someone turning right on red that would be going into my path.
- Buldak 8y ago>Also, at least where I live, the walk light wouldn't be on at the same time as someone turning right on red that would be going into my path. What guarantees this exactly? I'm having a hard time seeing how this is possible.
- war1025 8y agoIf they are turning right, and my walk light is on, then they already have a green light.
- bsder 8y ago> What changed that I was unaware of? As far as I know, it still makes traffic flow much more efficient in most situations. Right turn on red was mostly implemented to avoid having cars idling waiting for a timer-only light to turn. Between modern cars with fast engine stop/start and modern sensor technology which triggers lights when there is no opposing traffic, there are a lot of good reasons to remove that rule again.
- helthanatos 8y agoYou would have to add a right turn arrow for your logic to pan out.