3 ms·
I don't get an excitement. There is already IDA Pro and Binary Ninja, developing at a big pace and with actual support. Moreover, there is FOSS radare2[1] and C
by xvilka 8y ago
I don't get an excitement. There is already IDA Pro and Binary Ninja, developing at a big pace and with actual support. Moreover, there is FOSS radare2[1] and Cutter[2], that also being developed at crazy speed. We have even work in progress decompiler radeco[3][4], though there is still a lot to be done. If people would contribute - there is a lot of time until March (time of GHIDRA release).
[1] https://github.com/radare/radare2 https://github.com/radare/radare2
[2] https://github.com/radareorg/cutter https://github.com/radareorg/cutter
[3] https://github.com/radareorg/radeco https://github.com/radareorg/radeco
[4] https://github.com/radareorg/radeco-lib https://github.com/radareorg/radeco-lib
- leetbulb 8y agoI've used r2 extensively. It's an extremely valuable tool set. Thank you and everyone else for the amazing work! I am very excited for its future.
- fortenforge 8y agoSurely you can see how something that combines the best of both worlds (FOSS like r2 and feature-rich / has a working decompiler like IDA / binja) would be of interest to people right?
- xvilka 8y agoRSA talk description never said anything about open sourcing it. Only about "free". And from WikiLeaks Vault7 documents it appears to be buggy.