4 ms·

Those numbers are not comparable, and you don't have enough information to make such claim. It is plainly irrelevant, no matter how "the best data available" it

Those numbers are not comparable, and you don't have enough information to make such claim. It is plainly irrelevant, no matter how "the best data available" it is.

eightysixfour 8y ago
Found some data for you: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/fi30.cfm https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/f... These are traffic deaths per 100 million vehicle miles by functional system type. There is not a single road type on this list, including the lowest (urban freeways), with lower fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles than Tesla Autopilot (which is 1/3 fatalities per 100 million VMT).
- ucaetano 8y ago
  Again, not comparable. You're comparing a new, luxury car, with the general death rate of roads. You'd need to compare the rate of accidents of a Tesla with and without the system engaged, or at least the Tesla compared to other luxury cars. Which wouldn't even be that relevant, because autopilot features have been available for much longer in other cars. And that's before you include the fact that autopilot hands over the control to humans, so, again, the numbers aren't comparable. I understand your desperate need to validate your internal assumptions, but you don't have external data to do so.
  - mdorazio 8y ago
    Nailed it. One additional piece of information to throw in the pile - insurance claims for Teslas show more frequent accident rates than comparable luxury vehicles [1]. Again, we would need granular data to draw actual conclusions, but Tesla's marketing-friendly claims on autopilot safety are mostly bogus. [1] https://www.autonews.com/article/20170604/FINANCE_AND_INSURANCE/170609884/tesla-owners-should-pay-more-for-insurance-aaa-says https://www.autonews.com/article/20170604/FINANCE_AND_INSURA...

4 ms·

Those numbers are not comparable, and you don't have enough information to make such claim. It is plainly irrelevant, no matter how "the best data available" it

by ucaetano 8y ago

Those numbers are not comparable, and you don't have enough information to make such claim. It is plainly irrelevant, no matter how "the best data available" it is.

eightysixfour 8y ago
Found some data for you: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/fi30.cfm https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2016/f... These are traffic deaths per 100 million vehicle miles by functional system type. There is not a single road type on this list, including the lowest (urban freeways), with lower fatalities per 100 million vehicle miles than Tesla Autopilot (which is 1/3 fatalities per 100 million VMT).
- ucaetano 8y ago
  Again, not comparable. You're comparing a new, luxury car, with the general death rate of roads. You'd need to compare the rate of accidents of a Tesla with and without the system engaged, or at least the Tesla compared to other luxury cars. Which wouldn't even be that relevant, because autopilot features have been available for much longer in other cars. And that's before you include the fact that autopilot hands over the control to humans, so, again, the numbers aren't comparable. I understand your desperate need to validate your internal assumptions, but you don't have external data to do so.
  - mdorazio 8y ago
    Nailed it. One additional piece of information to throw in the pile - insurance claims for Teslas show more frequent accident rates than comparable luxury vehicles [1]. Again, we would need granular data to draw actual conclusions, but Tesla's marketing-friendly claims on autopilot safety are mostly bogus. [1] https://www.autonews.com/article/20170604/FINANCE_AND_INSURANCE/170609884/tesla-owners-should-pay-more-for-insurance-aaa-says https://www.autonews.com/article/20170604/FINANCE_AND_INSURA...