> Who would risk building their company on a stack that you lose the license for if you do too well? You could frame this in a different way and come to a diff

> Who would risk building their company on a stack that you lose the license for if you do too well? You could frame this in a different way and come to a different conclusion. Instead of describing OSS as a "stack you lose the license for if you do too well" you could say "stack you don't have to pay for unless you're successful".