2 ms·
I'm not certain - are you using orthographic or perspective rendering of the generated fields? I only ask because it seemed like the "source box" (I don't know
by cr0sh 8y ago
I'm not certain - are you using orthographic or perspective rendering of the generated fields? I only ask because it seemed like the "source box" (I don't know what to call it - just something I saw as a wireframe in the Lorenz demo) seemed orthographic.
If so - it'd be nice to be able to switch between the two using the parameter controls or something; I understand why on a tool like this you'd want the orthographic view, but from an aesthetic perspective, having the perspective view would be nice to look at.
I'm not the audience, though, for this kind of tool - I barely understand what's being done (the math is way above my pay grade, but the simulation and visualization code is neat to see in action, and I could imagine potential artistic rendering uses for the tool).
EDIT: Looking at the code, it seems like you set up the camera to be in perspective mode - so I don't know why that "source box" thing I saw appears to be orthographic? Regardless, having both modes available might be useful (and maybe - on thinking about it - some kind of "bounding box" labeled grid on three sides?)...
- jamportz 8y agoIt's doing a perspective rendering. You can change the camera FOV in the controls (which approaches orthographic as the FOV goes to zero). I could add a specific orthographic mode though perhaps.