6 ms·
I'm sure most of us have seen this but for those who have not - ed is the standard editor! https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html https://www.gnu.org/fun/jo
by smhenderson 8y ago
I'm sure most of us have seen this but for those who have not - ed is the standard editor!
https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html
- krylon 8y agoIt never gets old. ;-)
- smhenderson 8y agoIndeed! The whole GNU humor section of the site is all pretty classic stuff.
- justwalt 8y agoThe “WYGIWYG” line is absolutely brilliant.
- tarboreus 8y agoLoving it.
- cat199 8y agofunny only if you don't know the context.. e.g. it was 'standard' aka invoked by default as $EDITOR as opposed to say ex or teco, etc. so calling it 'standard' was a good thing here, since it informed you about how the system worked..
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- badcede 8y agoGenerous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm the novice with verbosity.
- karmickoala 8y agoI googled the author, Patrick J. LoPresti, trying to know more about him and what he is up to. I haven't looked deeply, but I found this easter egg on the game Wasteland 2 [1]: 1992 M.I.T. Class Ring Description 2 city skylines are etched along the edges of this gold ring. The face features a busy beaver. The name "Patrick J. LoPresti" is engraved in script on the interior. I wonder if it's a tribute because of his joke. [1]: https://wasteland.gamepedia.com/1992_M.I.T_Class_Ring https://wasteland.gamepedia.com/1992_M.I.T_Class_Ring
- ksherlock 8y agoIn the kickstarter, $2,000 let you design a personalized item. Wasteland was released in 1988 so somebody who graduated in 1992 may have had fond collegiate memories.
- cjcole 8y agoThat was inspired by Subgenius rants (hence the crossposting to alt.slack). We were pretty into the Church of the Subgenius around that time.
- coliveira 8y agoI learned ed, and find it is still useful in many situations. For example, if I want to add a line of text to a file from the command line, I just use ed directly. Another example is trying to change a single line in a file. Even in 2019, ed is still a useful piece of software.
- dorfsmay 8y agoWhy ed over ex?
- coliveira 8y agoed is standard. You can use it anywhere there is UNIX.
- zamadatix 8y agoex and vi are also in the POSIX standard. As far as popularity I've actually seen plenty of e.g. busybox based systems that leave ed out but keep vi.
- mcguire 8y agoEd is the standard text editor! Ex doesn't have much in the way of features that demand an upgrade.[1] Vi is too heavyweight; waiting for the screen refresh is tedious. [1] Although I recall using it. No idea why. (Mmmmm, 1200bps modem from a C-64.)
- dorfsmay 8y agoThe thing is, if you use vi/vim in your day to day work, you already know ex. Not only that, but most people who will enhance and debug your script will also already know ex (from using it within vi).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]