4 ms·
I'm not sure that a recorded video would have been the same. The source for the techcrunch article says: > The Singapore Police Force in an earlier statement,
by brianpgordon 8y ago
I'm not sure that a recorded video would have been the same. The source for the techcrunch article says:
> The Singapore Police Force in an earlier statement, said that Wham had organised an indoor public assembly featuring a foreign speaker, which required a Police permit.
Although given that political films are also banned, maybe a prerecorded video would have been illegal under a different law.
- angelsl 8y agoThe problem is the intent of the gathering, not that it had a foreign speaker. (Not that I agree with the law, but that's what it says.)