4 ms·
> I mean, your homepage is pretty damn lacking Do you honestly believe cybersecurity decisions should come down to how snazzy a homepage is, rather than a comp
by CiPHPerCoder 8y ago
> I mean, your homepage is pretty damn lacking
Do you honestly believe cybersecurity decisions should come down to how snazzy a homepage is, rather than a company's reputation?
> and you even put something like this without putting any sources
That article being discussed in this thread in particular quotes:
1. The opinions of other security experts
2. RFC 7515, section 4.1.1
3. The auth0 article about RS256/HS256 confusion
4. RFC 7518
5. The Adobe attack on ECDH-ES
What additional kind of sources do you need? The arguments should be sufficiently supported by the material available.
> This just looks like a poor attempt at making something 'better'.
By what metrics could we make this attempt less "poor"? What specific changes do you need to see?