3 ms·
> bury the mass Or burn it - at least it would be a sustainable energy source.
by Angostura 8y ago
> bury the mass
Or burn it - at least it would be a sustainable energy source.
- PakG1 8y agoCreate a carbon cycle similar to the water cycle then?
- schiffern 8y agoAlready exists. We've now identified many biogeochemical cycles. An incomplete list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silica_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silica_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphorus_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphorus_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonate-silicate_cycle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonate-silicate_cycle
- gdpgreg 8y agoEasier to just burry it, treating it for use in combustion systems wouldn't be worth it given the energy density is low. Better off using Sabatier process with excess solar at that point.