You seem to have cut out the actual argument i made, which you are in fact proving: 1. The law in the US definitely does not change quickly, and you've cited no

You seem to have cut out the actual argument i made, which you are in fact proving: 1. The law in the US definitely does not change quickly, and you've cited nothing to say it does. 2. I cited these very statistics and explicitly said they are not the kind of level of social consensus that tends to change the law. You have provided nothing to argue otherwise. I can't tell whether you claim it is not becoming legal where there is large enough local consensus (which is definitely true, and supports my larger point).