> Okay so non-cognitive development is ... clearly lacking in government supported child-care [citation needed] The study did not make any such claim; it only

> Okay so non-cognitive development is ... clearly lacking in government supported child-care [citation needed] The study did not make any such claim; it only claimed that non-cognitive development is important. One would need to study the non-cognitive development across various child-care providers, measuring by price, caregiver education level, curriculum, and a wide variety of other factors to determine which (if any) affect non-cognitive development. The problem could be as simple as improving the toys, games, and learning materials provided to the kids or as intractable as kids requiring a 1:1 caregiver (aka a stay-at-home parent). Or anywhere in-between.