4 ms·
To guard against the risk of a bug/design flaw affecting all vehicles simultaneously, I would include an independent "dumb" override that was too dumb to drive
by SiVal 8y ago
To guard against the risk of a bug/design flaw affecting all vehicles simultaneously, I would include an independent "dumb" override that was too dumb to drive but could stop all vehicles as soon as any of several TBD conditions occurred, regardless of what the primary "smart" system was telling the vehicle to do. It wouldn't be "smart" AI, but just something listening to both the AI's smart sensors and it's own, independent, simple sensors, and if ANY of them reported a listed condition, it would override the smart system and stop traffic.
Human intervention would be required to enable the vehicles to move again.
After some real-world experience, I would want to give the emergency stop system the ability to release the hold on one layer of vehicles at a time, allowing the smart AI to drive again but at a speed limited by the "dumb" system to nothing faster than human walking speed, enabling them to clear the area. If they cleared without further incident, the next layer would be released until the whole stoppage either cleared itself or was restopped because something was still wrong.