3 ms·
Searching for “jetpack” in a fresh —no cookies— browser session returns: • https://jetpack.com/ https://jetpack.com/ • https://twitter.com/jetpack https://twi
by guessmyname 8y ago
Searching for “jetpack” in a fresh —no cookies— browser session returns:
• https://jetpack.com/ https://jetpack.com/
• https://twitter.com/jetpack https://twitter.com/jetpack
• https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/ https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/
Which are the canonical URLs for JetPack, by Automatic.
KidkArolis will have a hard time promoting his project.
---
My suggestion for KidkArolis is to rename his project to one fo these:
• “ConvePack” considering the slogan “Webpack made more convenient”
• “WrapPack” considering the description “Jetpack wraps webpack”
• “SimplePack” assuming his project is simpler than WebPack
- franciscop 8y agoI had very similar critic of "server js", but with enough backlinks and a bit of time it seems to be solved. Though it's not exactly the same, in my case it was because of "noise", in this case it'd because of a competing brand. I'd say keep jetpack to see how it turns out, they are vastly different projects.
- Jarwain 8y agoWhat about rocketpack, to fit its current naming theme? Or spiderpack? Netpack? Silkpack?
- ksec 8y agoOR JustPack? I remember one of the main Goal of WebPack 5 was sane defaults. ( I cant find the post anymore ) So hopefully the WebPack team can learn a lot from JetPack.