3 ms·
But babies obviously love sugar, so this title is ridiculous. Just because you don't love dipping a moist steak in a tub of salt doesn't mean you don't love sal
by jazoom 8y ago
But babies obviously love sugar, so this title is ridiculous. Just because you don't love dipping a moist steak in a tub of salt doesn't mean you don't love salty foods. That's too much of a good thing.
- headsoup 8y agoMaybe you should actually read the article instead of spouting nonsense.
- jazoom 8y agoI don't read articles with ridiculous titles. They don't get my eyeballs. What did I say that is "nonsense"? Perhaps you can enlighten me?
- headsoup 8y agoBabies do not 'obviously love sugar.' They just have the sweet taste-buds first, which aligns with breastmilk being sweet. The baby is just as likely to be freaking out at the sensation overload (not necessarily in a bad way) rather than enjoying the sugar. Also, babies are familiar with tastes from before birth depending on what the mother ate, so it's also likely the mothers have had quite the sweet tooth while pregnant. But it's not a preference thing for babies, it's physiological...
- jazoom 8y agoOkay cool. Thank you for enlightening me. I guess I'll just go back to medical school since some dude from HN thinks my professional observations are nonsense.
- headsoup 8y agoWell you did come here stating how frequently you're giving babies sugar and that you can't be bothered reading articles you're commenting on...so assumptions may be made.
- jazoom 8y agoI commented on the title only. I made that obvious. I also didn't say anything about frequency. I also don't get my medical knowledge from The Guardian.