4 ms·
This post seems to try and refute really technical philosophy with simplified to the point of being wrong science. It just seems awkward as a result. But thin
by FakeComments 8y ago
This post seems to try and refute really technical philosophy with simplified to the point of being wrong science.
It just seems awkward as a result.
But thinking really simplified science is enough to completely dismiss other serious thinkers is why scientists get called closed minded: to use their parlance, this rant isn’t even wrong.
- buboard 8y agoSame can be said about philosophy. And therein lies a schism between physicists and philosophers that lasts for a few decades now, that has leads to them mostly avoiding each other and growing increasingly orthogonal arguments to avoid any chance of synthesis.
- SiempreViernes 8y agoEh, probably Hossenfelder found some popular account of panpsychism that did in fact argue that electrons have some sort of independent consciousness, maybe even written by a philosopher. In fact, I spot just the argument she refuted being stated as a reply elsewhere in these comments, preceded by the words "She misses the point". In any event, what exactly is simplified to the point of being wrong? That more internal states effects cross sections?