3 ms·

Also this would probably end up with a high majority remain vote, since the leave voters would be split between options A and B. Similar to the issues with Firs

• stordoff 8y ago
  There's no reason, in theory, that it couldn't be a ranked vote (so people could vote, e.g. 1) Leave the EU with this deal, 2) Remain in the EU). While ever there's the prospect of no deal, there's probably a bias towards Remain anyway (as many who want to leave probably don't want to leave without a deal). This avoids that.
  • benj111 8y ago
    Or 2 questions 1. Do you want to remain? 2. Do you accept the negotiated deal? As a remainer, the idea of a vote split is nice, I don't think its fair or defensible and just stores issues for later as Brexiteers wont accept the result.
    • stordoff 8y ago
      I'm not sure how that would work - say you get Do you want to remain? -> no; Do you accept the negotiated deal? -> no. Does that mean we should leave without a deal, OR does it mean we should negotiate for a different deal? Likewise, Do you want to remain -> yes; Do you accept the negotiated deal? -> yes - does that mean we should remain OR that we should accept the deal (you can't do both). You could _want_ to remain, but also find the negotiated deal acceptable. I don't think it gives a clear answer.
      • benj111 8y ago
        Its 2 questions that everybody answers. Obviously if we choose to remain, the negotiated deal wouldn't be needed. That's just an issue with the current wording. I'm not in favour of an open ended renegotiate option, we've had that, its a bit of a mess, but if parliament wants to put forward an actionable, achievable plan then I would be happy to vote on that.