Yes we do. I would challenge you to find the actual science that shows that we have less time. Actually demonstrated not just speculated. Furthermore the idea

Yes we do. I would challenge you to find the actual science that shows that we have less time. Actually demonstrated not just speculated. Furthermore the idea of stopping climate change is in itself completely up for grasp. What does that actually mean, what consequences are we prepared to pay? Is it better to halt growth, are we ready to invade China to stop them are we ready to stop poor countries from getting access to cheap reliable energy sources just because they are dirty? What are you even doing here if you actually really thought we had 10 years left? Why are you supporting the very system that apparently is going to destroy earth? So start now with what at what cost? I am personally not going to support any attempt at halting growth as growth is the only way we can actually pay for investment in cleaner energies and if the result really is catastrophic why are people so against nuclear which is the greenest, safest, most scalable, plentiful energy form we have? Climate catastrophism helps exactly no one. It paralyzes whole societies and makes them completely irrational making irrational decisions. So thanks but no thanks. I take my chances with a world using growth to establish better and better solutions not forcing superficially insufficient and unrealiable energy sources such as wind and solar. Each to their own of course but it's not getting my support.