I think that's op's point. Calling someone with a disability a power user... grates. There's a big difference between my productivity-enhancing .vimrc and not

I think that's op's point. Calling someone with a disability a power user... grates. There's a big difference between my productivity-enhancing .vimrc and not being able to use something. Half the devs seem to understand this. Either way, it's a valid decision if Google decides not to implement the requested feature. But there's a difference between "We're not implementing a feature for power users" and "We're not implementing an accessibility feature for disabled users." The whole point of ADA is that we should strive, where possible, to allow people with disabilities to live the same lives everyone else enjoys.