> Given well enough built tooling and consistent enough polyrepo structure (all using same VCS, all being linked from common tooling, following common coding st

> Given well enough built tooling and consistent enough polyrepo structure (all using same VCS, all being linked from common tooling, following common coding standards and using the same build tooling, etc.) the distinction from having a monorepo is more of an implementation detail. Exactly. Sure, you can manually recreate a monorepo from a multirepo system, but … why do that? That takes software engineering effort that you could spend on your product instead.