3 ms·

Look at you trying to save face, even willing to insult my intelligence to do so. In fact, nothing is complicated here. You just didnt know the meaning of "just

Look at you trying to save face, even willing to insult my intelligence to do so. In fact, nothing is complicated here. You just didnt know the meaning of "just-so" stories and refus to accept that you were wrong about that, even after you typed it out yourself. The funny thing is in the irony when you typed that point out yourself, it still managed to go over your head that: the phrase was misused, and that fact was my only point I was trying to make here. This would make anyone question your own intelligence, not other's! Have a good day. I'm not going to keep repeating myself or continue to interact with someone who has bad faith.

stcredzero 8y ago
Look at you trying to save face, even willing to insult my intelligence to do so. In fact, nothing is complicated here. You just didnt know the meaning of "just-so" stories and refus to accept that you were wrong about that Whoa, no. Now you really sound like the typical anti-evolutionist troller. Go and listen to some of Bret Weinstein's lectures or YouTube videos. "just so stories" in an evolutionary biology context are precisely failed theories in evolutionary biology, and they can be Darwinian just as they can be Lamarckian or Rostaferian. the phrase was misused Basically, you were misapplying the phrase as used in a different context in the evolutionary biology context, which you yourself evoked by mentioning Lamarckianism. Have a good day. I'm not going to keep repeating myself or continue to interact with someone who has bad faith. I'm confident that 3rd party readers can tell the difference. I suspect you can correlate that with the sheer number of other people trying to disabuse you of the same notion.