5 ms·

Only if no partial credit is offered, which is not how his exam[0] reads to me: As usual, answering any (sub)problem with “I don’t know” (and nothing e

• dunham 8y ago
  I had a math prof who would give negative marks on proofs, preferring you say “I don’t know how to do this step” and finishing the proof over trying to BS the step.
  • thfuran 8y ago
    How do you skip a step in a proof? You just say "assuming I can prove this assertion, this other stuff follows"? That seems to risk accidentally skipping way more steps than you thought you were skipping and quite probably the meat of the proof.
    • dragonwriter 8y ago
      > How do you skip a step in a proof? Well, from the math profs I've seen, the usual method is to interpose “it is intuitively obvious” in place of the skipped step(s). The tricky part is having a correct intuition as to what you should be skipping to, sure, but that's the same problem as you have doing a proof (minus actually figuring out the justification) since humans don't generally do proofs by exhaustively listing every possible next step from what is already proven in a BFS until getting the desired result and then pruning all the other paths.
    • __MatrixMan__ 8y ago
      Prompted with: Given A, prove Z You'd append Assume G => H ...to the prompt, then you'd prove A=>G, and you'd prove H=>Z. You're essentially just using one-too-many axioms to get the job done, which is less elegant, but correct.
    • dunham 8y ago
      Essentially that. There is a risk a skipping a majority of the proof and hence a majority of the points, but point-wise it would work out better than handwaving the step and getting negative points. It's been about 25 years, so my memory is a bit fuzzy, but it was an analysis class. I don't remember if I ever availed myself of this. I did have a classmate who completed, but didn't turn in his homework a couple of times. (I don't recall if it was the entire problem set or just a couple of problems that he omitted, but he got the paper out to consult while the prof was going over the answers.) The teacher was competent but quirky - he also required the students to purchase a stapler (to staple their homework) and locked the door after class started (if you were late, tough luck).
    • deleted 8y ago
      [deleted]
  • laurentl 8y ago
    A math prof of mine would label insufficient initialization in recursive proofs with i.i. (it also stood for a few other common mistakes, such as “incorrect integration” or whatever). And he would invariably add “i.i = -1”, which was the penalty for such mistakes (exams being graded out of 20). A deliciously nerdy joke, unless you’re on the receiving end.
• mcguire 8y ago
  I wonder how much credit the "this is the work of Satan" answers got?
  • jefferickson 8y ago
    None, because I never found out who submitted it.