3 ms·
Thanks for this explanation. This is one of the things that popped out at me when I looked at the book page. The statement about not providing answers seemed qu
by smarks 8y ago
Thanks for this explanation. This is one of the things that popped out at me when I looked at the book page. The statement about not providing answers seemed quite dogmatic, and my initial reaction was, why? Turns out it's not so dogmatic, and there's a thoughtful and nuanced explanation. Perhaps you could include some of this on the book page, or provide a link to the explanation elsewhere.
- _underflow_ 8y agoCompletely agree - being outside academia has apparently made me ignorant to a lot of the pitfalls to actually posting said solutions. Makes perfect sense when put this way. I also really appreciate the response from the author. I forget the gurus behind books like this often have a presence here on HN.
- ultrasounder 8y agoNot always the case though Prof. Erickson seems to be the exception
- jefferickson 8y agoGood idea.