That's only going to improve the company he's not going to be working at, rewarding them for already failing to do their jobs (who put this guy is an interviewe

That's only going to improve the company he's not going to be working at, rewarding them for already failing to do their jobs (who put this guy is an interviewer's position? etc.) There's something paradoxical about this statement, I'm not sure if it's the way I'm reading it, or even if you intended it that way. But if there was a "failure" here, and I were in that company's HR and Recruiting shoes-I'd probably want to know about it, and surely you would too if it were your company looking to grow and bring in talent to reach goals? Would you tolerate your staff treating candidates this way?