4 ms·
Scary how? If you send a photo to Google's computers, expect someone to look at it and classify it. If the expectation is that one can drown that possibility aw
by Retra 8y ago
Scary how? If you send a photo to Google's computers, expect someone to look at it and classify it. If the expectation is that one can drown that possibility away using volume, then one would need to reassess their understanding of the purpose of computers.
What are your expectations, and why would the elicit such an extreme reaction to the status quo?
- innagadadavida 8y agoGoogle could take the label and create user profiles and then they are auctioned off on their massive ad exchange. You will then be hit with ads based on your photos, it could lead to some very scary or embarrassing moments depending on you photos perhaps? This image classification can be done on client devices as well and backed up to the cloud with encryption. Expecting Google to do this is unreasonable.
- Retra 8y agoStill not seeing what's scary there. If you don't want other people to see your photos, you shouldn't be sending (or uploading) them anywhere. If you don't want to see ads, don't use services that show ads. Sure, image classification can be done anywhere. People could classify their own images without any algorithm. The point is, image classification isn't scary, and I don't see how it could be. Using classifications to manipulate people might be scary, but that has little to do with whether it is done by Google, the server, or the client. If you don't want your images classified, don't send them to photo stores whose entire reason for being is the organization and classification of data.
- JeremyBanks 8y ago> Still not seeing what's scary there. If you don't want other people to see your photos, you shouldn't be sending (or uploading) them anywhere. That's disingenuous: Google strongly and repeatedly encourages Android users to enable Google Photos for private backup with a single click. Users don't like to lose photos, and their phone vendor is telling them how to avoid it. This often isn't an informed or premeditated decision.
- Retra 8y agoSure, that's a problem, but a very different problem. I don't think I've ever seen a profit-focused company seriously give any weight to encouraging its customers to make good, informed decisions.
- morpheuskafka 8y agoI always am puzzled by this type of argument. Surely it is not wrong for a company to advertise its own products and make it easy to sign up. It's on the user to be a critical consumer and it stands to reason that if you opt in to a service called "Company A Photos" that Company A might just have some access to your photos to provide services.
- Hendrikto 8y agoI knew they were doing this. I am just objecting to calling this “mundane”.
- stan_rogers 8y ago"[S]eemingly mundane". As in something you (a human) wouldn't need to put any thought or effort into. It doesn't actually occur to Muggles that there are things that they do that are actually hard problems for computers, even if they understand that there are all sorts of things computers can do in a flash that would exhaust their personal resources for weeks on end.
- criddell 8y agoWhat's scary about this? I think it's pretty awesome and makes my photo collection a lot more useful to me.