7 ms·

Springer's CS Reading Room (Free access to CS journals)

36 points by clyfe 16y ago

_delirium 16y ago
Hmm, this is an interesting experiment, though clearly positioned as more of a "free trial sample" than "open access" kind of thing. They're making a bunch of stuff free (w/ login), but they rotate which stuff it is every three months, presumably in hopes that by then you'll have gotten hooked on something and demand that your library subscribe to it.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- alextp 16y ago
  For most research purposes this is awful, though. Usually one's a lot more interested in this or that specific paper than in a random journal edition, as it is well known that both (1) academic journals end up having a low signal-to-noise ratio and (2) compounding that, most academic knowledge is very specific, so most of what's around will feel like uninteresting tripe to all but the most easily excitable reader (and I say this as a wannabe cs academic). It's easy to forget how I am that machine learning and natural language processing have seemed to neatly avoid most closed-access traps (ACM, IEEE, Springer, Elsevier) and instead rely on open conferences and journals (and the closed-access Computational Linguistics journal is very often full of expanded versions of good ACL papers), and at the same time most researchers do realize that more people reading their work means more influence.
  - tomjen3 16y ago
    Excellent market segmentation though: this is useless for academics, who normally subscribe to these journals, so they will continue to pay through the nose but it could be very useful for the theoretically oriented computer programmer who likes to check up on what is new in his field, but who isn't likely to subscribe to these journals, unless you can get him hocked. The fact that they sell other peoples work, paid for by government and other public founds, is just even more brilliant.
- hyperbovine 16y ago
  They are probably spooked that somebody is going to pull a Journal of Algorithms on them.
showerst 16y ago
It's a tiny detail on an otherwise cool site, but the 10 character maximum on the password when you create an account is really annoying.
- geekdesigngirl 16y ago
  It's not just the 10 character limit but also they disallow special characters (i.e. no exclamation mark). When I developed my web app, I had a wise programmer tell me to allow up to 32 characters with special characters. I don't like being limited to what my password can be. My bank's website is horrible at that.
  - smanek 16y ago
    Yeah, Amex's site only lets you use 8 characters (and it's case insensitive!).
jarin 16y ago
When I saw CS Reading Room, I immediately thought "Christian Science Reading Room". Glad I actually clicked the link :)

36 points by clyfe 16y ago

Hmm, this is an interesting experiment, though clearly positioned as more of a "free trial sample" than "open access" kind of thing. They're making a bunch of stuff free (w/ login), but they rotate which stuff it is every three months, presumably in hopes that by then you'll have gotten hooked on something and demand that your library subscribe to it.

deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
alextp 16y ago
For most research purposes this is awful, though. Usually one's a lot more interested in this or that specific paper than in a random journal edition, as it is well known that both (1) academic journals end up having a low signal-to-noise ratio and (2) compounding that, most academic knowledge is very specific, so most of what's around will feel like uninteresting tripe to all but the most easily excitable reader (and I say this as a wannabe cs academic). It's easy to forget how I am that machine learning and natural language processing have seemed to neatly avoid most closed-access traps (ACM, IEEE, Springer, Elsevier) and instead rely on open conferences and journals (and the closed-access Computational Linguistics journal is very often full of expanded versions of good ACL papers), and at the same time most researchers do realize that more people reading their work means more influence.
- tomjen3 16y ago
  Excellent market segmentation though: this is useless for academics, who normally subscribe to these journals, so they will continue to pay through the nose but it could be very useful for the theoretically oriented computer programmer who likes to check up on what is new in his field, but who isn't likely to subscribe to these journals, unless you can get him hocked. The fact that they sell other peoples work, paid for by government and other public founds, is just even more brilliant.
hyperbovine 16y ago
They are probably spooked that somebody is going to pull a Journal of Algorithms on them.

showerst 16y ago

It's a tiny detail on an otherwise cool site, but the 10 character maximum on the password when you create an account is really annoying.

geekdesigngirl 16y ago
It's not just the 10 character limit but also they disallow special characters (i.e. no exclamation mark). When I developed my web app, I had a wise programmer tell me to allow up to 32 characters with special characters. I don't like being limited to what my password can be. My bank's website is horrible at that.
- smanek 16y ago
  Yeah, Amex's site only lets you use 8 characters (and it's case insensitive!).

jarin 16y ago

When I saw CS Reading Room, I immediately thought "Christian Science Reading Room". Glad I actually clicked the link :)