3 ms·
I wouldn't call Boulder Open Source, but rather Libre as it is under MPL 2.0, a file level copyleft license.
by StudentStuff 8y ago
I wouldn't call Boulder Open Source, but rather Libre as it is under MPL 2.0, a file level copyleft license.
- naniwaduni 8y agoWhat definitions of open source have any traction that the MPL, any version, is excluded?
- StudentStuff 8y agoOpen source as a term was popularized as a way to promote licenses that are not "viral" (aka requires release of modified versions of code). This is why many developers default to the BSD license and similar, despite how it allows others to come along and close up their work, like what Sony did with the PS4.